Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Costa Rica
18.5%
in 2022
Mongolia
17.6%
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
13th
Mongolia rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 18.5% against 17.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 25 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.2% | 15.1% | 2.1% | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 54.8% | 17.6% | 37.2% | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 18.5% against 17.6% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 0.9%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Costa Rica ranks 13th and Mongolia ranks 14th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group