Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 41.2% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Belarus is 41.2%, measured in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.5% on the previous year and up 83.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Belarus peaked at 135.0% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 20.6%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 7th of 26 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 20.6% | — |
| 2009 | 22.4% | +8.7% |
| 2010 | 23.5% | +4.9% |
| 2012 | 24.8% | +5.6% |
| 2013 | 34.7% | +39.7% |
| 2014 | 41.6% | +20.0% |
| 2015 | 37.1% | -10.9% |
| 2016 | 135.0% | +264.0% |
| 2017 | 41.0% | -69.6% |
| 2018 | 41.8% | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 41.2% | -1.5% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 41.2% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 39.8%, 1.0× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 41.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.2%, 1.8× the median. (18 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 21.5% | 20.6% | 22.4% | 2 |
| 2010s | 46.7% | 23.5% | 135.0% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Belarus was 41.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 135.0% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 20.6% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 7th out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 83.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group