Belarus vs Serbia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
41.2%
in 2019
Serbia
53.6%
in 2022
Belarus rank
7th
Serbia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 53.6% against 41.2% in Belarus, a difference of 12.4%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Serbia ahead.
Belarus ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 4th of 26 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 53.6% against 41.2% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Serbia?
- 12.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Serbia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Serbia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Serbia ranks 4th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group