Belarus vs Republic of Moldova: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
41.2%
in 2019
Republic of Moldova
26.6%
in 2018
Belarus rank
7th
Republic of Moldova rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 41.2% against 26.6% in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 14.6%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.5 times Republic of Moldova's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.
Belarus ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 10th of 26 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Republic of Moldova?
- Belarus, at 41.2% against 26.6% in Republic of Moldova as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Republic of Moldova?
- 14.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Republic of Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Belarus and Republic of Moldova rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Republic of Moldova ranks 10th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group