Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social was 35.6% in 2020. ▬ Flat

Latest (2020)
35.6%
Change on year
up 2.8%
World rank
16th
of 37 countries
All-time high
41.0%
in 2012
All-time low
27.2%
in 2014
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia, 2007–2020

0102030402007201320202007: 30.42009: 34.22010: 30.72011: 39.72012: 412014: 27.22016: 33.52018: 34.72020: 35.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Mongolia stood at 35.6%.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.8% on the previous year and up 16.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Mongolia peaked at 41.0% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 27.2%, in 2014.

Mongolia ranks 16th of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 30.4%
2009 34.2% +12.5%
2010 30.7% -10.4%
2011 39.7% +29.6%
2012 41.0% +3.2%
2014 27.2% -33.6%
2016 33.5% +23.0%
2018 34.7% +3.6%
2020 35.6% +2.8%

Mongolia compared with similar countries

  • Mongolia's 35.6% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 34.6%, 1.0× the median. (24 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 32.3% 30.4% 34.2% 2
2010s 34.5% 27.2% 41.0% 6
2020s 35.6% 35.6% 35.6% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 14 South Africa 39.7% compare
  2. 15 Türkiye 37.3% compare
  3. 17 Argentina 33.6% compare
  4. 18 Panama 31.4% compare
  5. 19 Chile 30.9% compare

See the full ranking of 37 places →

More work & labour data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social in Mongolia was 35.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 41.0% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 27.2% in 2014.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
Mongolia ranks 16th out of 37 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 16.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-all-social-protection-and-labor/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
37 places, 372 data points, 2002–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group