Mongolia vs South Africa: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social
Mongolia
35.6%
in 2020
South Africa
39.7%
in 2021
Mongolia rank
16th
South Africa rank
14th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social over time
- Mongolia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 39.7% against 35.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Mongolia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.5% | 141.4% | 109.9% | South Africa |
| 2020s | 35.6% | 68.6% | 33.0% | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social, Mongolia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 39.7% against 35.6% in Mongolia as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social between Mongolia and South Africa?
- 4.1%, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and South Africa?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and South Africa rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -all social?
- Mongolia ranks 16th and South Africa ranks 14th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) -All Social Protection and Labor. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group