Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social was 29.2% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 29.2% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 1.5% on the previous year and up 65.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus peaked at 124.1% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 17.0%, in 2008.
That places Belarus 14th out of 35 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social in Belarus, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 17.0% | — |
| 2009 | 17.7% | +4.1% |
| 2010 | 18.6% | +5.1% |
| 2012 | 18.4% | -1.1% |
| 2013 | 23.2% | +26.6% |
| 2014 | 29.8% | +28.3% |
| 2015 | 27.9% | -6.3% |
| 2016 | 124.1% | +344.4% |
| 2017 | 29.7% | -76.1% |
| 2018 | 28.7% | -3.2% |
| 2019 | 29.2% | +1.5% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 29.2% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 36.1%, 81% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 29.2% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 25.1%, 1.2× the median. (23 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.3% | 17.0% | 17.7% | 2 |
| 2010s | 36.6% | 18.4% | 124.1% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 11 Kazakhstan 33.7% compare
- 12 Panama 33.4% compare
- 13 Costa Rica 30.4% compare
- 15 Mexico 28.5% compare
- 16 Kyrgyzstan 26.4% compare
- 17 Ecuador 25.8% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social in Belarus was 29.2% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 124.1% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 17.0% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 14th out of 35 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 65.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group