Belarus vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
29.2%
in 2019
Costa Rica
30.4%
in 2022
Belarus rank
14th
Costa Rica rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 30.4% against 29.2% in Belarus, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Belarus ranks 14th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.0% | 44.2% | 27.3% | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 38.3% | 29.1% | 9.2% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Costa Rica, at 30.4% against 29.2% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 1.2%, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 14th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group