Belarus vs Ecuador: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social
Belarus
29.2%
in 2019
Ecuador
25.8%
in 2022
Belarus rank
14th
Ecuador rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social over time
- Belarus
- Ecuador
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 29.2% against 25.8% in Ecuador, a difference of 3.4%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Belarus ranks 14th and Ecuador ranks 17th of 35 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.0% | 26.8% | 9.9% | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 38.3% | 24.7% | 13.6% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social, Belarus or Ecuador?
- Belarus, at 29.2% against 25.8% in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social between Belarus and Ecuador?
- 3.4%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Ecuador?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Ecuador rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - all social?
- Belarus ranks 14th and Ecuador ranks 17th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - All Social Assistance (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group