Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Georgia: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)

Europe and Central Asia: High income
2.94
in 2027
Georgia
6.53
in 2027
Europe and Central Asia: High income rank
71st
Georgia rank
71st

Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) over time

  • Europe and Central Asia: High income
  • Georgia
02468200520162027

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 6.53 against 2.94 in Europe and Central Asia: High income, a difference of 3.59.

That makes Georgia's figure about 2.2 times Europe and Central Asia: High income's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Europe and Central Asia: High income ahead.

Europe and Central Asia: High income ranks 71st and Georgia ranks 71st of 87 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Europe and Central Asia: High income averaged higher in 1 and Georgia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Europe and Central Asia: High income Georgia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.42 3 0.4206 Europe and Central Asia: High income
2010s 4.21 6.11 1.9 Georgia
2020s 3.19 6.15 2.96 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates), Europe and Central Asia: High income or Georgia?
Georgia, at 6.53 against 2.94 in Europe and Central Asia: High income as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates) between Europe and Central Asia: High income and Georgia?
3.59, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Europe and Central Asia: High income and Georgia?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Europe and Central Asia: High income and Georgia rank globally for time-related underemployment rate (ilo modelled estimates)?
Europe and Central Asia: High income ranks 71st and Georgia ranks 71st of 87 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Georgia: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/europe-and-central-asia-high-income/georgia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-rate-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/europe-and-central-asia-high-income/georgia/">Europe and Central Asia: High income vs Georgia: Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. The time-related underemployment rate conveys the number of persons in time-related underemployment as a percent of the total number of persons in employment. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.