Nepal vs Western Asia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) over time
- Nepal
- Western Asia
How they compare
Western Asia currently reports 3,695 against 559.15 in Nepal, a difference of 3,136.
That makes Western Asia's figure about 6.6 times Nepal's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Western Asia has been ahead every year.
Nepal ranks 52nd and Western Asia ranks 55th of 188 countries.
Western Asia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Western Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 455.03 | 1,155 | 699.94 | Western Asia |
| 2010s | 495.88 | 2,533 | 2,037 | Western Asia |
| 2020s | 557.98 | 3,626 | 3,068 | Western Asia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Nepal or Western Asia?
- Western Asia, at 3,695 against 559.15 in Nepal as of 2027.
- What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Nepal and Western Asia?
- 3,136, with Western Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Western Asia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
- How do Nepal and Western Asia rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
- Nepal ranks 52nd and Western Asia ranks 55th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.