Angola vs Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)

Angola
511.23
in 2027
Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
4,124
in 2027
Angola rank
54th
Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income rank
53rd

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) over time

  • Angola
  • Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k200520162027

How they compare

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income currently reports 4,124 against 511.23 in Angola, a difference of 3,613.

That makes Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income's figure about 8.1 times Angola's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 54th and Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 53rd of 188 countries.

Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income Difference Ahead
2000s 455.51 1,651 1,196 Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
2010s 602.75 3,128 2,525 Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income
2020s 501.39 4,080 3,579 Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates), Angola or Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income?
Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income, at 4,124 against 511.23 in Angola as of 2027.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) between Angola and Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income?
3,613, with Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income?
23 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2027.
How do Angola and Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates)?
Angola ranks 54th and Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Labour Organization, published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates). Statizoid, drawing on International Labour Organization. Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/angola/europe-and-central-asia-upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under ILO Terms of Use (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15/angola/europe-and-central-asia-upper-middle-income/">Angola vs Europe and Central Asia: Upper-middle income: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+)
Source
International Labour Organization
Licence
ILO Terms of Use (attribution required)
Coverage
276 places, 6,324 data points, 2005–2027
Last refreshed

Imputed observations are not based on national data, are subject to high uncertainty and should not be used for country comparisons or rankings. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. Persons in time-related underemployment comprise all persons in employment, who satisfy the following three criteria during the reference period: a) are willing to work additional hours; b) are available to work additional hours i.e., are ready, within a specified subsequent period, to work additional hours, given opportunities for additional work; and c) worked less than a threshold relating to working time i.e., persons whose hours actually worked in all jobs during the reference period were below a threshold, to be chosen according to national circumstances. For details, refer to the Resolution concerning the measurement of underemployment and inadequate employment situations. For more information, refer to the ILO Modelled Estimates (ILOEST) database description.