North Macedonia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit

North Macedonia
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
North Macedonia rank
141st
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
142nd

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit over time

  • North Macedonia
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
000000200520152025

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2005 it was North Macedonia ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 141st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 142nd of 185 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2010s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP North Macedonia
2020s 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP 0 units per US$ of GDP North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit, North Macedonia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
North Macedonia, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2025.
What is the difference in time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit between North Macedonia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0 units per US$ of GDP, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
21 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
How do North Macedonia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per unit?
North Macedonia ranks 141st and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 142nd of 185 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-unit-of-gdp/north-macedonia/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/time-related-underemployment-ilo-modelled-estimates-15-per-unit-of-gdp/north-macedonia/united-kingdom/">North Macedonia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per unit of GDP
Unit
units per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
188 places, 3,880 data points, 2005–2025
Last refreshed

Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.