China vs Netherlands: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals

China
3.26 0-6 scale
in 2012
Netherlands
3.61 0-6 scale
in 2025
China rank
3rd
Netherlands rank
1st

Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals over time

  • China
  • Netherlands
01234198520052025

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 3.61 0-6 scale against 3.26 0-6 scale in China, a difference of 0.35 0-6 scale.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Netherlands ahead.

China ranks 3rd and Netherlands ranks 1st of 41 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 3.26 0-6 scale 3.27 0-6 scale 0.0119 0-6 scale Netherlands
2010s 3.26 0-6 scale 3.24 0-6 scale 0.0198 0-6 scale China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals, China or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 3.61 0-6 scale against 3.26 0-6 scale in China as of 2025.
What is the difference in strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals between China and Netherlands?
0.35 0-6 scale, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Netherlands?
5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
How do China and Netherlands rank globally for strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals?
China ranks 3rd and Netherlands ranks 1st of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals (regular contracts). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Netherlands: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-individual-dismissals-regular-contracts/china/netherlands-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-individual-dismissals-regular-contracts/china/netherlands-2/">China vs Netherlands: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals (regular contracts)
Unit
0-6 scale
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
50 places, 1,336 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD indicators of employment protection are synthetic indicators of the strictness of regulation on dismissals and the use of temporary contracts. For each year, indicators refer to regulation in force on the 1st of January. For more information and full methodology, see OECD Indicators of Employment Protection webpage Last data update: May 2022 OECD statistics contact: ELS.Contact@oecd.org