China vs Czechia: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals

China
3.26 0-6 scale
in 2012
Czechia
3.26 0-6 scale
in 2025
China rank
3rd
Czechia rank
3rd

Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals over time

  • China
  • Czechia
01234199320092025

How they compare

China currently reports 3.26 0-6 scale against 3.26 0-6 scale in Czechia, a difference of 0 0-6 scale.

Across all 5 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

China ranks 3rd and Czechia ranks 3rd of 41 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s 3.26 0-6 scale 3.38 0-6 scale 0.127 0-6 scale Czechia
2010s 3.26 0-6 scale 3.34 0-6 scale 0.0847 0-6 scale Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals, China or Czechia?
China, at 3.26 0-6 scale against 3.26 0-6 scale in Czechia as of 2012.
What is the difference in strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals between China and Czechia?
0 0-6 scale, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Czechia?
5 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2012.
How do China and Czechia rank globally for strictness of employment protection — individual dismissals?
China ranks 3rd and Czechia ranks 3rd of 41 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals (regular contracts). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Czechia: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-individual-dismissals-regular-contracts/china/czechia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/strictness-of-employment-protection-individual-dismissals-regular-contracts/china/czechia/">China vs Czechia: Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Strictness of employment protection — Individual dismissals (regular contracts)
Unit
0-6 scale
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
50 places, 1,336 data points, 1985–2025
Last refreshed

The OECD indicators of employment protection are synthetic indicators of the strictness of regulation on dismissals and the use of temporary contracts. For each year, indicators refer to regulation in force on the 1st of January. For more information and full methodology, see OECD Indicators of Employment Protection webpage Last data update: May 2022 OECD statistics contact: ELS.Contact@oecd.org