Mongolia vs Romania: LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization for persons ages 25 to
LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization for persons ages 25 to over time
- Mongolia
- Romania
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 8.31 against 7.42 in Romania, a difference of 0.89.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Romania ahead.
Mongolia ranks 38th and Romania ranks 40th of 56 countries.
Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization for persons ages 25 to, Mongolia or Romania?
- Mongolia, at 8.31 against 7.42 in Romania as of 2017.
- What is the difference in lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization for persons ages 25 to between Mongolia and Romania?
- 0.89, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Romania?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2017.
- How do Mongolia and Romania rank globally for lu4: composite rate of labour underutilization for persons ages 25 to?
- Mongolia ranks 38th and Romania ranks 40th of 56 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Labour Organization, published as LU4: Composite rate of labour underutilization for persons ages 25 to 54 (previous ILO definition - ICLS13). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
With the aim of promoting international comparability, statistics presented on ILOSTAT are based on standard international definitions wherever feasible and may differ from official national figures. This series is based on the 13th ICLS definitions. For time series comparability, it includes countries that have implemented the 19th ICLS standards, for which data are also available in the Work Statistics -- 19th ICLS (WORK) database. LU4 represents the share of the extended labour force, in this case for persons of prime age (i.e., persons ages 25 to 54), that are in unemployment, time-related underemployment or the potential labour force. For more information, refer to the Gender Equality and Non-Discrimination Indicators (GEND) database description.