Chile vs Russian Federation: Informal employment
Informal employment over time
- Chile
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 47.1% against 41.0% in Chile, a difference of 6.1%.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 18th of 44 countries.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47.8% | 51.3% | 3.5% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 39.4% | 46.2% | 6.8% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, Chile or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 47.1% against 41.0% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment between Chile and Russian Federation?
- 6.1%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Russian Federation?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Russian Federation rank globally for informal employment?
- Chile ranks 21st and Russian Federation ranks 18th of 44 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment (% of total agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in agricultural activities out of total employment in agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises persons whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).