Botswana vs Mongolia: Informal employment, female
Informal employment, female over time
- Botswana
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 96.5% against 95.2% in Botswana, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Mongolia ahead.
Botswana ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 5th of 41 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 79.6% | 98.0% | 18.4% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 92.4% | 96.9% | 4.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, female, Botswana or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 96.5% against 95.2% in Botswana as of 2025.
- What is the difference in informal employment, female between Botswana and Mongolia?
- 1.3%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Mongolia rank globally for informal employment, female?
- Botswana ranks 8th and Mongolia ranks 5th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, female (% of total female agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in agricultural activities out of total employment in agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises persons whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).