Armenia vs Botswana: Informal employment, female
Informal employment, female over time
- Armenia
- Botswana
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 96.2% against 95.2% in Botswana, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Botswana ahead.
Armenia ranks 7th and Botswana ranks 8th of 41 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Botswana in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 58.6% | 79.6% | 21.0% | Botswana |
| 2020s | 96.9% | 92.4% | 4.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher informal employment, female, Armenia or Botswana?
- Armenia, at 96.2% against 95.2% in Botswana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in informal employment, female between Armenia and Botswana?
- 1.0%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Botswana?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Armenia and Botswana rank globally for informal employment, female?
- Armenia ranks 7th and Botswana ranks 8th of 41 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Labour Force Statistics database (LFS), International Labour Organization (ILO), published as Informal employment, female (% of total female agricultural employment). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This indicator shows the share of workers at working age in informal employment in agricultural activities out of total employment in agricultural activities, expressed as a percentage. Informal employment comprises persons whose main or secondary jobs are informal. For own-account workers and employers, informality is determined by enterprise characteristics (unincorporated, market-based, and unregistered); for contributing family workers, it is determined by the absence of written contracts and lack of coverage under labor legislation; and for employees, it is determined by whether the employment relationship is not subject to national labor legislation, income taxation, or social protection. The data are based on the statistical standards adopted by the 19th International Conference of Labour Statisticians (ICLS).