Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Poland
Poland: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0005 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Poland, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Poland is 0.0005 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is up 3.9% on the previous year and down 74.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Poland peaked at 0.0019 units per square kilometre in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.0005 units per square kilometre, in 2022.
Poland ranks 129th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Poland, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | -15.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | -18.3% |
| 2009 | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | +8.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | +6.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2012 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +21.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0019 units per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | -5.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | -30.2% |
| 2016 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | -14.7% |
| 2017 | 0.001 units per square kilometre | -8.2% |
| 2018 | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | -19.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | -7.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | -18.7% |
| 2021 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | -6.9% |
| 2022 | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | -15.3% |
| 2023 | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | 0.0019 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Poland
- 126 Fiji 0.0005 units per square kilometre compare
- 127 Sweden 0.0005 units per square kilometre compare
- 128 Czechia 0.0005 units per square kilometre compare
- 130 Romania 0.0004 units per square kilometre compare
- 131 Myanmar 0.0004 units per square kilometre compare
- 132 New Zealand 0.0004 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Poland?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Poland was 0.0005 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0019 units per square kilometre in 2013.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0005 units per square kilometre in 2022.
- How does Poland rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Poland ranks 129th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 74.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.