Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Panama
Panama: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0021 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Panama, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Panama recorded 0.0021 units per square kilometre for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in 2023.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 14.7% on the previous year and up 59.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Panama peaked at 0.0026 units per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0011 units per square kilometre, in 2011.
That places Panama 74th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Panama, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | +0.1% |
| 2007 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2008 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | +5.8% |
| 2009 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2010 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | +5.3% |
| 2011 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | -12.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2013 | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | +7.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | -13.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | +12.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +31.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0021 units per square kilometre | +20.2% |
| 2020 | 0.0024 units per square kilometre | +15.9% |
| 2021 | 0.0026 units per square kilometre | +10.2% |
| 2022 | 0.0024 units per square kilometre | -8.4% |
| 2023 | 0.0021 units per square kilometre | -14.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | 0.0012 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | 0.0021 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0024 units per square kilometre | 0.0021 units per square kilometre | 0.0026 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Panama
- 71 Cameroon 0.0022 units per square kilometre compare
- 72 Costa Rica 0.0022 units per square kilometre compare
- 73 Israel 0.0021 units per square kilometre compare
- 75 Sao Tome and Principe 0.002 units per square kilometre compare
- 76 Serbia 0.0019 units per square kilometre compare
- 77 Iraq 0.0019 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Panama
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.192 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.1956 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.1888 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.03 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.09 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,652 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,175 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,950 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,955 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,905 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Panama?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Panama was 0.0021 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Panama?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0026 units per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Panama?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0011 units per square kilometre in 2011.
- How does Panama rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Panama ranks 74th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Panama?
- Over the last ten years it is up 59.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Panama data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.