Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Liberia
Liberia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0006 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Liberia, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Liberia stood at 0.0006 units per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.2% on the previous year and up 44.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Liberia peaked at 0.0006 units per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.0003 units per square kilometre, in 2005.
Liberia ranks 122nd of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Liberia, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +4.2% |
| 2008 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | +3.9% |
| 2009 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +3.6% |
| 2010 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +3.4% |
| 2011 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +3.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 2013 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2014 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +10.4% |
| 2016 | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | +10.6% |
| 2017 | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 2020 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | +16.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | -0.8% |
| 2022 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | -8.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | +2.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Liberia
- 119 Finland 0.0006 units per square kilometre compare
- 120 Brazil 0.0006 units per square kilometre compare
- 121 South Sudan 0.0006 units per square kilometre compare
- 123 Jamaica 0.0006 units per square kilometre compare
- 124 Congo 0.0005 units per square kilometre compare
- 125 New Caledonia 0.0005 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Liberia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.1439 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.1155 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.1716 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.202 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.59 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 6,689 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,115 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 6,410 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 6,256 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 12,665 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Liberia?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Liberia was 0.0006 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Liberia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0006 units per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Liberia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0003 units per square kilometre in 2005.
- How does Liberia rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Liberia ranks 122nd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Liberia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 44.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Liberia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.