Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Latvia
Latvia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0003 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▼ Falling
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Latvia, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
The most recent figure for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Latvia is 0.0003 units per square kilometre, measured in 2023.
The figure is down 8.7% on the previous year and down 63.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Latvia peaked at 0.0011 units per square kilometre in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0.0001 units per square kilometre, in 2005.
That places Latvia 142nd out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Latvia, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | +408.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | -34.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | +37.4% |
| 2009 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | +86.8% |
| 2010 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0009 units per square kilometre | -17.9% |
| 2012 | 0.0009 units per square kilometre | -1.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | -14.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | -24.5% |
| 2015 | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | +9.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | -2.1% |
| 2017 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | -11.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | -31.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | +5.5% |
| 2020 | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | +44.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0005 units per square kilometre | -10.5% |
| 2022 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -40.2% |
| 2023 | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | -8.7% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | 0.0001 units per square kilometre | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0004 units per square kilometre | 0.0003 units per square kilometre | 0.0006 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 139 Chad 0.0003 units per square kilometre compare
- 140 Hungary 0.0003 units per square kilometre compare
- 141 Norway 0.0003 units per square kilometre compare
- 143 Papua New Guinea 0.0003 units per square kilometre compare
- 144 Zambia 0.0003 units per square kilometre compare
- 145 North Macedonia 0.0003 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Latvia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.02 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.94 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.2718 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 1,152 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 365.13 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 470.3 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 455.07 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 925.37 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Latvia?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Latvia was 0.0003 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0011 units per square kilometre in 2010.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0001 units per square kilometre in 2005.
- How does Latvia rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Latvia ranks 142nd out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 63.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.