Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Georgia
Georgia: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0015 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Georgia, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Georgia stood at 0.0015 units per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 0.9% on the previous year and up 2.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Georgia peaked at 0.0017 units per square kilometre in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.0007 units per square kilometre, in 2007.
That places Georgia 88th out of 186 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Georgia, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2007 | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | -3.6% |
| 2008 | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2009 | 0.001 units per square kilometre | +27.8% |
| 2010 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | +13.6% |
| 2011 | 0.0013 units per square kilometre | +10.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | +10.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +8.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +1.3% |
| 2015 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +4.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +7.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | -5.5% |
| 2018 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2019 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | -2.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | -27.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +32.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +5.6% |
| 2023 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0008 units per square kilometre | 0.0007 units per square kilometre | 0.001 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | 0.0011 units per square kilometre | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
- 85 Germany 0.0016 units per square kilometre compare
- 86 Eswatini 0.0016 units per square kilometre compare
- 87 Austria 0.0016 units per square kilometre compare
- 89 Mozambique 0.0014 units per square kilometre compare
- 90 Greece 0.0014 units per square kilometre compare
- 91 Brunei Darussalam 0.0014 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Georgia?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Georgia was 0.0015 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0017 units per square kilometre in 2016.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0007 units per square kilometre in 2007.
- How does Georgia rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Georgia ranks 88th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 2.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.