Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Cuba
Cuba: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.003 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Cuba, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
Cuba recorded 0.003 units per square kilometre for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in 2023. That is the lowest value across all 19 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 5.1% on the previous year and down 7.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Cuba peaked at 0.0035 units per square kilometre in 2020 and was at its lowest, 0.003 units per square kilometre, in 2023.
Cuba ranks 60th of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Cuba, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | -1.7% |
| 2007 | 0.003 units per square kilometre | -1.0% |
| 2008 | 0.003 units per square kilometre | -0.1% |
| 2009 | 0.0032 units per square kilometre | +7.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0032 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0032 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0032 units per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 2014 | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2015 | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | +0.6% |
| 2016 | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | +1.2% |
| 2017 | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | -0.0% |
| 2018 | 0.0034 units per square kilometre | +1.0% |
| 2019 | 0.0034 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2020 | 0.0035 units per square kilometre | +4.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | -5.0% |
| 2022 | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | -5.9% |
| 2023 | 0.003 units per square kilometre | -5.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | 0.003 units per square kilometre | 0.0032 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0033 units per square kilometre | 0.0031 units per square kilometre | 0.0034 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0032 units per square kilometre | 0.003 units per square kilometre | 0.0035 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Cuba
- 57 Sri Lanka 0.0033 units per square kilometre compare
- 58 Viet Nam 0.0032 units per square kilometre compare
- 59 Ireland 0.003 units per square kilometre compare
- 61 Türkiye 0.003 units per square kilometre compare
- 62 Sierra Leone 0.0028 units per square kilometre compare
- 63 Spain 0.0027 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Cuba
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.07 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.06 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.09 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.1738 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 9,101 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,722 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,757 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,821 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 5,577 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Cuba?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Cuba was 0.003 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Cuba?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0035 units per square kilometre in 2020.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Cuba?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.003 units per square kilometre in 2023.
- How does Cuba rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Cuba ranks 60th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Cuba?
- Over the last ten years it is down 7.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Cuba data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.