Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Barbados
Barbados: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.019 units per square kilometre in 2023. ◆ Volatile
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Barbados, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Barbados stood at 0.019 units per square kilometre.
That represents a change of down 20.4% on the previous year and up 154.9% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Barbados peaked at 0.0273 units per square kilometre in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0056 units per square kilometre, in 2010.
Barbados ranks 10th of 186 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Barbados, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0061 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0063 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2007 | 0.0068 units per square kilometre | +8.0% |
| 2008 | 0.0065 units per square kilometre | -3.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0058 units per square kilometre | -10.9% |
| 2010 | 0.0056 units per square kilometre | -4.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0061 units per square kilometre | +9.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0065 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2013 | 0.0074 units per square kilometre | +14.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0092 units per square kilometre | +23.2% |
| 2015 | 0.0122 units per square kilometre | +32.8% |
| 2016 | 0.0147 units per square kilometre | +21.0% |
| 2017 | 0.0143 units per square kilometre | -2.9% |
| 2018 | 0.0168 units per square kilometre | +17.3% |
| 2019 | 0.0183 units per square kilometre | +9.1% |
| 2020 | 0.0199 units per square kilometre | +8.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0273 units per square kilometre | +37.3% |
| 2022 | 0.0238 units per square kilometre | -12.6% |
| 2023 | 0.019 units per square kilometre | -20.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0063 units per square kilometre | 0.0058 units per square kilometre | 0.0068 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0111 units per square kilometre | 0.0056 units per square kilometre | 0.0183 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0225 units per square kilometre | 0.019 units per square kilometre | 0.0273 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Barbados
- 7 Rwanda 0.0242 units per square kilometre compare
- 8 Benin 0.0206 units per square kilometre compare
- 9 Haiti 0.0204 units per square kilometre compare
- 11 Netherlands 0.0189 units per square kilometre compare
- 12 Bangladesh 0.0179 units per square kilometre compare
- 13 Burundi 0.0148 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Barbados
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7079 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.6853 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7302 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.9854 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.8257 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 114.42 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 165.89 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 97.75 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 96.95 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 194.7 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Barbados?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Barbados was 0.019 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Barbados?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0273 units per square kilometre in 2021.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Barbados?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0056 units per square kilometre in 2010.
- How does Barbados rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Barbados ranks 10th out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Barbados?
- Over the last ten years it is up 154.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Barbados data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.