Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Bahamas
Bahamas: Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per was 0.0017 units per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Bahamas, 2005–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Bahamas stood at 0.0017 units per square kilometre.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 2.5% on the previous year and up 6.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Bahamas peaked at 0.0018 units per square kilometre in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0014 units per square kilometre, in 2006.
Bahamas ranks 81st of 186 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 19 years of available data.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per in Bahamas, year by year
| Year | units per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | — |
| 2006 | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | -1.3% |
| 2007 | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2008 | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2009 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +7.1% |
| 2010 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +0.5% |
| 2011 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2012 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2013 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 2014 | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | +0.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +0.3% |
| 2018 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 2019 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2020 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | -0.5% |
| 2021 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | -1.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 2023 | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | -2.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0015 units per square kilometre | 0.0014 units per square kilometre | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | 0.0016 units per square kilometre | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | 0.0017 units per square kilometre | 0.0018 units per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Bahamas
- 78 Madagascar 0.0018 units per square kilometre compare
- 79 Equatorial Guinea 0.0018 units per square kilometre compare
- 80 Albania 0.0018 units per square kilometre compare
- 82 Tonga 0.0017 units per square kilometre compare
- 83 Slovenia 0.0016 units per square kilometre compare
- 84 Lesotho 0.0016 units per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Bahamas
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.2501 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.2148 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.2821 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.22 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.4187 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 419.94 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 54.95 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 200.05 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 184.9 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 384.95 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Bahamas?
- Time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per in Bahamas was 0.0017 units per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Bahamas?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0018 units per square kilometre in 2022.
- What is the lowest time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per recorded in Bahamas?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0014 units per square kilometre in 2006.
- How does Bahamas rank for time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per?
- Bahamas ranks 81st out of 186 countries with data for 2023.
- Is time-related underemployment (ilo modelled estimates) (15+), per rising or falling in Bahamas?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Bahamas data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 19 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) International Labour Organization
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Time-related underemployment (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.