Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square in Ecuador
Ecuador: Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square was 0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023. ▲ Rising
Latest (2023)
0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre
Change on year
up 0.9%
World rank
115th
of 191 countries
All-time high
0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre
in 2023
All-time low
0.0085 1000 No per square kilometre
in 1961
Years of data
63
1961–2023
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square in Ecuador, 1961–2023
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in 1000 No per square kilometre.
Analysis
In 2023, population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square in Ecuador stood at 0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre. That is the highest value across all 63 years on record.
The figure is up 0.9% on the previous year and up 13.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square in Ecuador peaked at 0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023 and was at its lowest, 0.0085 1000 No per square kilometre, in 1961.
Ecuador ranks 115th of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 63 years of available data.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 1000 No per square kilometre | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1961 | 0.0085 1000 No per square kilometre | — |
| 1962 | 0.0088 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1963 | 0.009 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1964 | 0.0093 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1965 | 0.0096 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1966 | 0.0099 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1967 | 0.0102 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1968 | 0.0105 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1969 | 0.0108 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1970 | 0.0111 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1971 | 0.0114 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1972 | 0.0118 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1973 | 0.0121 1000 No per square kilometre | +3.0% |
| 1974 | 0.0125 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1975 | 0.0128 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1976 | 0.0132 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.9% |
| 1977 | 0.0136 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1978 | 0.014 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1979 | 0.0144 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.8% |
| 1980 | 0.0147 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1981 | 0.0151 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1982 | 0.0156 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1983 | 0.016 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1984 | 0.0164 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.7% |
| 1985 | 0.0168 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.6% |
| 1986 | 0.0172 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.5% |
| 1987 | 0.0177 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1988 | 0.0181 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.4% |
| 1989 | 0.0185 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1990 | 0.0189 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 0.0193 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.2% |
| 1992 | 0.0197 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.1% |
| 1993 | 0.0201 1000 No per square kilometre | +2.0% |
| 1994 | 0.0205 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1995 | 0.0209 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1996 | 0.0213 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1997 | 0.0217 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.9% |
| 1998 | 0.0247 1000 No per square kilometre | +13.5% |
| 1999 | 0.0251 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2000 | 0.0255 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2001 | 0.026 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2002 | 0.0264 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2003 | 0.0269 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2004 | 0.0274 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.8% |
| 2005 | 0.0279 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2006 | 0.0283 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2007 | 0.0288 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2008 | 0.0293 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2009 | 0.0298 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2010 | 0.0303 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2011 | 0.0308 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2012 | 0.0313 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.6% |
| 2013 | 0.0318 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2014 | 0.0323 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2015 | 0.0327 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.4% |
| 2016 | 0.0332 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2017 | 0.0337 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.5% |
| 2018 | 0.0343 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2019 | 0.0349 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.7% |
| 2020 | 0.0353 1000 No per square kilometre | +1.1% |
| 2021 | 0.0355 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0358 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.8% |
| 2023 | 0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre | +0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0096 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0085 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0108 1000 No per square kilometre | 9 |
| 1970s | 0.0127 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0111 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0144 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1980s | 0.0166 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0147 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0185 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 1990s | 0.0212 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0189 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0251 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2000s | 0.0276 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0255 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0298 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2010s | 0.0325 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0303 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0349 1000 No per square kilometre | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0357 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0353 1000 No per square kilometre | 0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre | 4 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 112 Ireland 0.0373 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 113 Lesotho 0.0371 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 114 Tajikistan 0.0368 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 116 North Macedonia 0.0353 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 117 Eswatini 0.0351 1000 No per square kilometre compare
- 118 Equatorial Guinea 0.0348 1000 No per square kilometre compare
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square in Ecuador?
- Population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square in Ecuador was 0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0361 1000 No per square kilometre in 2023.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0085 1000 No per square kilometre in 1961.
- How does Ecuador rank for population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square?
- Ecuador ranks 115th out of 191 countries with data for 2023.
- Is population - est. & proj. — total population - male, per square rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 13.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, per square kilometre. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 63 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male ÷ Land area (sq. km)
Computed from
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
- Land area FAOSTAT, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.