Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population was 512,656 1000 No in 2050. ◆ Volatile
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), 1950–2050
Source: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Measured in 1000 No.
Analysis
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) recorded 512,656 1000 No for population - est. & proj. — rural population in 2050. That is the highest value across all 101 years on record.
That represents a change of up 0.5% on the previous year and up 6.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, population - est. & proj. — rural population in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) peaked at 512,656 1000 No in 2050 and was at its lowest, 53,460 1000 No, in 1950.
That places Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) 6th out of 29 groups with data for 2050, putting it in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), year by year
| Year | 1000 No | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1950 | 53,460 1000 No | — |
| 1951 | 54,394 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 1952 | 55,332 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 1953 | 56,284 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 1954 | 57,258 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 1955 | 58,261 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1956 | 59,295 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1957 | 60,360 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1958 | 61,457 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1959 | 62,585 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1960 | 63,742 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1961 | 64,927 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1962 | 66,148 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1963 | 67,398 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1964 | 68,690 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1965 | 70,027 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1966 | 71,417 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1967 | 72,846 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1968 | 74,317 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1969 | 75,822 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1970 | 77,402 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 1971 | 79,015 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 1972 | 80,639 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 1973 | 82,279 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1974 | 83,937 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1975 | 85,612 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1976 | 87,303 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 1977 | 88,990 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1978 | 90,686 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1979 | 92,408 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1980 | 94,069 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1981 | 95,715 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1982 | 97,332 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 1983 | 98,969 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 1984 | 100,731 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 1985 | 102,685 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 1986 | 104,884 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 1987 | 107,298 1000 No | +2.3% |
| 1988 | 109,842 1000 No | +2.4% |
| 1989 | 112,499 1000 No | +2.4% |
| 1990 | 115,118 1000 No | +2.3% |
| 1991 | 117,706 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 1992 | 156,421 1000 No | +32.9% |
| 1993 | 205,797 1000 No | +31.6% |
| 1994 | 210,358 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 1995 | 215,007 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 1996 | 219,708 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 1997 | 224,493 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 1998 | 229,355 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 1999 | 234,300 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 2000 | 239,298 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2001 | 244,335 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2002 | 249,549 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2003 | 255,020 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 2004 | 260,567 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 2005 | 266,140 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2006 | 271,746 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2007 | 277,377 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2008 | 282,961 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 2009 | 288,688 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 2010 | 294,592 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 2011 | 300,789 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2012 | 316,106 1000 No | +5.1% |
| 2013 | 322,993 1000 No | +2.2% |
| 2014 | 329,913 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2015 | 336,811 1000 No | +2.1% |
| 2016 | 343,665 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 2017 | 350,479 1000 No | +2.0% |
| 2018 | 357,232 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 2019 | 363,935 1000 No | +1.9% |
| 2020 | 370,590 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 2021 | 377,188 1000 No | +1.8% |
| 2022 | 383,715 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 2023 | 390,162 1000 No | +1.7% |
| 2024 | 396,520 1000 No | +1.6% |
| 2025 | 402,781 1000 No | +1.6% |
| 2026 | 408,936 1000 No | +1.5% |
| 2027 | 414,979 1000 No | +1.5% |
| 2028 | 420,903 1000 No | +1.4% |
| 2029 | 426,704 1000 No | +1.4% |
| 2030 | 432,377 1000 No | +1.3% |
| 2031 | 437,915 1000 No | +1.3% |
| 2032 | 443,312 1000 No | +1.2% |
| 2033 | 448,562 1000 No | +1.2% |
| 2034 | 453,660 1000 No | +1.1% |
| 2035 | 458,606 1000 No | +1.1% |
| 2036 | 463,394 1000 No | +1.0% |
| 2037 | 468,020 1000 No | +1.0% |
| 2038 | 472,480 1000 No | +1.0% |
| 2039 | 476,771 1000 No | +0.9% |
| 2040 | 480,907 1000 No | +0.9% |
| 2041 | 484,890 1000 No | +0.8% |
| 2042 | 488,701 1000 No | +0.8% |
| 2043 | 492,345 1000 No | +0.7% |
| 2044 | 495,810 1000 No | +0.7% |
| 2045 | 499,094 1000 No | +0.7% |
| 2046 | 502,192 1000 No | +0.6% |
| 2047 | 505,101 1000 No | +0.6% |
| 2048 | 507,817 1000 No | +0.5% |
| 2049 | 510,336 1000 No | +0.5% |
| 2050 | 512,656 1000 No | +0.5% |
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1992 | +32.9% | 117,706 1000 No | 156,421 1000 No |
| 1993 | +31.6% | 156,421 1000 No | 205,797 1000 No |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 57,869 1000 No | 53,460 1000 No | 62,585 1000 No | 10 |
| 1960s | 69,533 1000 No | 63,742 1000 No | 75,822 1000 No | 10 |
| 1970s | 84,827 1000 No | 77,402 1000 No | 92,408 1000 No | 10 |
| 1980s | 102,402 1000 No | 94,069 1000 No | 112,499 1000 No | 10 |
| 1990s | 192,826 1000 No | 115,118 1000 No | 234,300 1000 No | 10 |
| 2000s | 263,568 1000 No | 239,298 1000 No | 288,688 1000 No | 10 |
| 2010s | 331,652 1000 No | 294,592 1000 No | 363,935 1000 No | 10 |
| 2020s | 399,248 1000 No | 370,590 1000 No | 426,704 1000 No | 10 |
| 2030s | 455,510 1000 No | 432,377 1000 No | 476,771 1000 No | 10 |
| 2040s | 496,719 1000 No | 480,907 1000 No | 510,336 1000 No | 10 |
| 2050s | 512,656 1000 No | 512,656 1000 No | 512,656 1000 No | 1 |
Countries ranked near Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- 3 China, mainland 272,509 1000 No compare
- 4 Democratic Republic of the Congo 71,473 1000 No compare
- 4 Pakistan 146,712 1000 No compare
- 5 Nigeria 123,508 1000 No compare
- 5 United Republic of Tanzania 61,539 1000 No compare
- 6 Ethiopia 116,333 1000 No compare
- 6 Viet Nam 48,918 1000 No compare
- 7 USSR 99,726 1000 No compare
- 8 Indonesia 87,446 1000 No compare
- 8 Türkiye 13,435 1000 No compare
- 9 Bangladesh 84,090 1000 No compare
- 9 Iran (Islamic Republic of) 13,112 1000 No compare
More work & labour data for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 1.43 million 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 709,419 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 719,059 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 426,627 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 2.81 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.4546 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.3003 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.298 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.2991 % change on previous year (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is population - est. & proj. — rural population in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Population - est. & proj. — rural population in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) was 512,656 1000 No in 2050, according to Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- What is the highest population - est. & proj. — rural population recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- The highest recorded value was 512,656 1000 No in 2050.
- What is the lowest population - est. & proj. — rural population recorded in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- The lowest recorded value was 53,460 1000 No in 1950.
- How does Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank for population - est. & proj. — rural population?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 6th out of 29 groups with data for 2050.
- Is population - est. & proj. — rural population rising or falling in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Over the last ten years it is up 6.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) data come from?
- The figures come from Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as part of Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 101 observations, free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO).
About this data
The FAOSTAT Population module contains time series data on population, by sex and urban/rural. The series consist of both estimates and projections for different periods as available from the original sources, namely: 1. Population data refers to the World Population Prospects: The 2024 Revision from the UN Population Division. 2. Urban/rural population data refers to the World Urbanization Prospects: The 2018 Revision from the UN Population Division.