Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps in Barbados

Barbados: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps was 48.29 in 2024. ▼ Falling

Latest (2024)
48.29
Change on year
up 2.5%
World rank
38th
of 171 countries
All-time high
62.19
in 1990
All-time low
37.98
in 2015
Years of data
35
1970–2024

Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Barbados, 1970–2024

02040601970199720241970: 53.41980: 58.71981: 58.41982: 581983: 57.71984: 571985: 56.41986: 55.71987: 551988: 57.91989: 58.61990: 62.21991: 60.61992: 58.61993: 57.41994: 56.21995: 61.41996: 60.61997: 58.12003: 542004: 51.72011: 49.42012: 42.52013: 41.82014: 46.12015: 382016: 432017: 39.52018: 40.52019: 41.92020: 40.72021: 39.52022: 422023: 47.12024: 48.3

Source: Statizoid (derived).

Analysis

The most recent figure for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Barbados is 48.29, measured in 2024.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 2.5% on the previous year and up 4.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Barbados peaked at 62.19 in 1990 and was at its lowest, 37.98, in 2015.

That places Barbados 38th out of 171 countries with data for 2024, putting it in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 35 years of available data.

Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps in Barbados, year by year

Annual values for Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled in Barbados, 1970 to 2024.
Year Value Change
1970 53.35 —
1980 58.73 +10.1%
1981 58.37 -0.6%
1982 58.02 -0.6%
1983 57.66 -0.6%
1984 57.02 -1.1%
1985 56.38 -1.1%
1986 55.74 -1.1%
1987 54.96 -1.4%
1988 57.94 +5.4%
1989 58.6 +1.1%
1990 62.19 +6.1%
1991 60.58 -2.6%
1992 58.59 -3.3%
1993 57.4 -2.0%
1994 56.22 -2.1%
1995 61.4 +9.2%
1996 60.65 -1.2%
1997 58.08 -4.2%
2003 54.02 -7.0%
2004 51.67 -4.4%
2011 49.45 -4.3%
2012 42.47 -14.1%
2013 41.82 -1.5%
2014 46.1 +10.2%
2015 37.98 -17.6%
2016 42.96 +13.1%
2017 39.47 -8.1%
2018 40.49 +2.6%
2019 41.95 +3.6%
2020 40.72 -2.9%
2021 39.5 -3.0%
2022 41.95 +6.2%
2023 47.1 +12.3%
2024 48.29 +2.5%

Barbados compared with similar countries

  • Barbados's 48.29 is above the median for high income countries, which is 36.18, 1.3× the median. (69 countries reporting)
  • Barbados's 48.29 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 34.97, 1.4× the median. (32 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 53.35 53.35 53.35 1
1980s 57.34 54.96 58.73 10
1990s 59.39 56.22 62.19 8
2000s 52.84 51.67 54.02 2
2010s 42.52 37.98 49.45 9
2020s 43.51 39.5 48.29 5

Countries ranked near Barbados

  1. 35 Bermuda 50.54 compare
  2. 36 Ethiopia 49.48 compare
  3. 37 Peru 48.57 compare
  4. 39 Brazil 48.01 compare
  5. 40 Paraguay 47.63 compare
  6. 41 Liechtenstein 47.33 compare

See the full ranking of 171 places →

More work & labour data for Barbados

All data for Barbados →

Frequently asked questions

What is labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Barbados?
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Barbados was 48.29 in 2024, according to Statizoid (derived).
What is the highest labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 recorded in Barbados?
The highest recorded value was 62.19 in 1990.
What is the lowest labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 recorded in Barbados?
The lowest recorded value was 37.98 in 2015.
How does Barbados rank for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
Barbados ranks 38th out of 171 countries with data for 2024.
Is labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 rising or falling in Barbados?
Over the last ten years it is up 4.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Barbados data come from?
The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Barbados. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-force-participation-rates-for-women-ages-15-24-2020-vs-1980-gaps-filled/barbados/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/labor-force-participation-rates-for-women-ages-15-24-2020-vs-1980-gaps-filled/barbados/">Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 in Barbados</a> — Statizoid

How this figure is calculated

Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.

Computed from

Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.

About this data

Indicator
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
171 places, 4,754 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.