Barbados vs Brazil: Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps
Barbados
48.29
in 2024
Brazil
48.01
in 2025
Barbados rank
38th
Brazil rank
39th
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs … gaps over time
- Barbados
- Brazil
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 48.29 against 48.01 in Brazil, a difference of 0.28.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Barbados ahead.
Barbados ranks 38th and Brazil ranks 39th of 171 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Brazil in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 53.35 | 26.32 | 27.03 | Barbados |
| 1980s | 57.06 | 44.79 | 12.27 | Barbados |
| 1990s | 59.39 | 50.49 | 8.9 | Barbados |
| 2000s | 52.84 | 54.9 | 2.06 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 42.52 | 48.82 | 6.3 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 43.51 | 47.99 | 4.47 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, Barbados or Brazil?
- Barbados, at 48.29 against 48.01 in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 between Barbados and Brazil?
- 0.28, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Brazil?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Brazil rank globally for labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980?
- Barbados ranks 38th and Brazil ranks 39th of 171 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Labor force participation rates for women ages 15 24 2020 vs 1980 with 625 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.