Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based … national in Russia
Russia: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based … national was 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2020. ▬ Flat
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Russia, 1992–2020
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage of population in the same subgroup.
Analysis
The most recent figure for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Russia is 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, measured in 2020. That is the lowest value across all 29 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.7% on the previous year and down 4.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Russia peaked at 93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2017 and was at its lowest, 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, in 2020.
That places Russia 10th out of 40 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based … national in Russia, year by year
| Year | Percentage of population in the same subgroup | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1992 | 89.1 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | — |
| 1993 | 90.59 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.7% |
| 1994 | 88.98 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.8% |
| 1995 | 88.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 1996 | 89.4 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.7% |
| 1997 | 90.94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.7% |
| 1998 | 90.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.6% |
| 1999 | 88.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.8% |
| 2000 | 89.78 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.1% |
| 2001 | 90.98 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.3% |
| 2002 | 91.46 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.5% |
| 2003 | 91.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.2% |
| 2004 | 91.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 91.72 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2006 | 92.43 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.8% |
| 2007 | 92.47 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 92.03 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.5% |
| 2009 | 91.28 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.8% |
| 2010 | 92.21 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.0% |
| 2011 | 92.58 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.4% |
| 2012 | 92.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.3% |
| 2013 | 92.64 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2014 | 92.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 92.52 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.3% |
| 2016 | 92.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2017 | 93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.7% |
| 2018 | 92.62 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.4% |
| 2019 | 92.28 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.4% |
| 2020 | 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -4.7% |
Russia compared with similar countries
- Russia's 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup is above the median for high income countries, which is 81.06 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, 1.1× the median. (32 countries reporting)
- Russia's 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 81.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, 1.1× the median. (24 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.63 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 88.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 90.94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 8 |
| 2000s | 91.57 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 89.78 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 92.47 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 10 |
| 2010s | 92.59 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 92.21 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 10 |
| 2020s | 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 1 |
Countries ranked near Russia
- 7 Cyprus 91.13 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 8 Czechia 90.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 9 Malta 89.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 11 Colombia 87.48 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 11 Netherlands 51.09 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 12 South Africa 87.09 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 13 Spain 86.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
More work & labour data for Russia
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 48,131 (2027)
- Labour force participation rate (ILO modelled estimates) 59.78 (2027)
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) 71,526 (2027)
- Unemployment rate (ILO modelled estimates) 1.83 (2027)
- Labour dependency ratio 1.04 (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2021 international $ at PPP 89,043 (2027)
- Output per worker, GDP constant 2015 US $ 23,578 (2027)
- Employment-to-population ratio (ILO modelled estimates) 58.68 (2027)
- Persons outside the labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+) 1.81 % change on previous year (2027)
- Labour force (ILO modelled estimates) (15+), annual growth rate -0.8326 % change on previous year (2027)
Frequently asked questions
- What is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Russia?
- Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Russia was 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2020, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Russia?
- The highest recorded value was 93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2017.
- What is the lowest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Russia?
- The lowest recorded value was 87.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2020.
- How does Russia rank for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
- Russia ranks 10th out of 40 countries with data for 2020.
- Is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national rising or falling in Russia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 4.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Russia data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 29 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.