Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Portugal
Portugal: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national was 91.89 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025. ▬ Flat
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Portugal, 1986–2025
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage of population in the same subgroup.
Analysis
The most recent figure for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Portugal is 91.89 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of up 0.3% on the previous year and up 1.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Portugal peaked at 94.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1990 and was at its lowest, 87.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, in 2007.
Portugal ranks 6th of 40 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Portugal, year by year
| Year | Percentage of population in the same subgroup | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1986 | 93.96 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | — |
| 1987 | 93.68 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.3% |
| 1988 | 93.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 1989 | 94.05 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.6% |
| 1990 | 94.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.0% |
| 1991 | 93.02 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.1% |
| 1992 | 92.84 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 1993 | 92.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 1994 | 92.25 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.4% |
| 1995 | 92.44 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.2% |
| 1996 | 91.24 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.3% |
| 1997 | 89.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.4% |
| 1998 | 88.93 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.2% |
| 1999 | 88.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.0% |
| 2000 | 89.01 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.1% |
| 2001 | 88.87 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2002 | 88.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2003 | 88.23 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.5% |
| 2004 | 88.53 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.3% |
| 2005 | 88.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.1% |
| 2006 | 88.55 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.1% |
| 2007 | 87.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.0% |
| 2008 | 87.84 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.2% |
| 2009 | 88.11 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.3% |
| 2010 | 88.14 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 90.77 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +3.0% |
| 2012 | 89.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 89.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.3% |
| 2014 | 90.36 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.7% |
| 2015 | 90.38 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 90.56 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.2% |
| 2017 | 91.04 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.5% |
| 2018 | 91.56 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.6% |
| 2019 | 91.51 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.1% |
| 2020 | 91.9 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.4% |
| 2021 | 92.06 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.2% |
| 2022 | 92.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.1% |
| 2023 | 91.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.5% |
| 2024 | 91.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2025 | 91.89 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.3% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 93.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 93.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 94.05 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 4 |
| 1990s | 91.64 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 88.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 94.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 10 |
| 2000s | 88.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 87.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 89.01 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 10 |
| 2010s | 90.4 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 88.14 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 91.56 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 10 |
| 2020s | 91.89 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 91.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 92.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 6 |
Countries ranked near Portugal
- 3 Latvia 91.12 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 3 North Macedonia 96.35 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 4 Greece 94.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 4 Slovenia 90.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 5 Hungary 94.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 5 Türkiye 86.76 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 6 Estonia 85.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 7 Cyprus 91.13 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 8 Czechia 90.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 9 Malta 89.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
More work & labour data for Portugal
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.0538 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.055 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.0528 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.1795 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,134 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,861 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 4,504 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 4,250 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 8,754 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Portugal?
- Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Portugal was 91.89 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Portugal?
- The highest recorded value was 94.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1990.
- What is the lowest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Portugal?
- The lowest recorded value was 87.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2007.
- How does Portugal rank for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
- Portugal ranks 6th out of 40 countries with data for 2025.
- Is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national rising or falling in Portugal?
- Over the last ten years it is up 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Portugal data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 40 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.