Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Latvia
Latvia: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national was 91.12 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025. ▬ Flat
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Latvia, 2000–2025
Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage of population in the same subgroup.
Analysis
The most recent figure for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Latvia is 91.12 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, measured in 2025.
That represents a change of down 0.9% on the previous year and down 1.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Latvia peaked at 93.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2007 and was at its lowest, 88.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, in 2000.
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Latvia, year by year
| Year | Percentage of population in the same subgroup | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 88.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | — |
| 2001 | 89.75 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.1% |
| 2002 | 90.14 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.4% |
| 2003 | 89.79 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.4% |
| 2004 | 89.38 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.5% |
| 2005 | 91.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +2.6% |
| 2006 | 93.33 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.8% |
| 2007 | 93.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.3% |
| 2008 | 93.35 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.3% |
| 2009 | 91.3 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -2.2% |
| 2010 | 90.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.1% |
| 2011 | 90.87 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.6% |
| 2012 | 90.73 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2013 | 91.98 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.4% |
| 2014 | 92.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.7% |
| 2015 | 92.14 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.5% |
| 2016 | 90.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.5% |
| 2017 | 91.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.8% |
| 2018 | 91.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +0.5% |
| 2019 | 90.84 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -1.2% |
| 2020 | 90.33 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.6% |
| 2021 | 91.38 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.2% |
| 2022 | 92.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | +1.3% |
| 2023 | 92.13 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.5% |
| 2024 | 91.97 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.2% |
| 2025 | 91.12 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | -0.9% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.12 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 88.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 93.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 10 |
| 2010s | 91.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 90.32 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 92.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 10 |
| 2020s | 91.59 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 90.33 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 92.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup | 6 |
Countries ranked near Latvia
- 1 Poland 93.69 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 1 Bulgaria 98.25 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 1 Croatia 96.02 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 2 Lithuania 93.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 2 Romania 97.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 3 North Macedonia 96.35 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 4 Greece 94.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 4 Slovenia 90.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 5 Hungary 94.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 5 Türkiye 86.76 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 6 Estonia 85.07 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
- 6 Portugal 91.89 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
More work & labour data for Latvia
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by 62.58 Persons (2022)
- Africa's Development Dynamics (AfDD) Table 32 - Employment by 26.74 Persons (2022)
- Average actual weekly hours worked in the main job of persons who 37.6 Hour (2025)
- Persons in full-time/part-time employment by professional status and 883.1 Thousand persons (2025)
- Labour force participation rates by educational attainment level 77.6% (2025)
- Employment rates by NUTS 2 region 64.5% (2025)
- Labour force by NUTS 2 region 948.9 Thousand persons (2025)
- Employment rates by educational attainment level, citizenship and 71.9% (2025)
- Labour force participation rates by NUTS 2 region 69.3% (2025)
- Labour force by educational attainment level and NUTS 2 region 948.9 Thousand persons (2025)
Frequently asked questions
- What is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Latvia?
- Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Latvia was 91.12 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
- What is the highest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Latvia?
- The highest recorded value was 93.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2007.
- What is the lowest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Latvia?
- The lowest recorded value was 88.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2000.
- How does Latvia rank for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
- Latvia ranks 3rd out of 11 countries with data for 2025.
- Is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national rising or falling in Latvia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Latvia data come from?
- The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 26 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).
About this data
This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.