Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway

Norway: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national was 74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025. ▬ Flat

Latest (2025)
74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Change on year
up 0.0%
World rank
30th
of 40 countries
All-time high
77.79 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 1972
All-time low
70.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 1983
Years of data
54
1972–2025

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway, 1972–2025

020406080197219982025

Source: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Measured in Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

Analysis

Norway recorded 74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in 2025.

That represents a change of up 1.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway peaked at 77.79 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1972 and was at its lowest, 70.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, in 1983.

That places Norway 30th out of 40 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway, year by year

Annual values for Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions in Norway, 1972 to 2025.
Year Percentage of population in the same subgroup Change
1972 77.79 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
1973 77.05 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.9%
1974 76.9 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
1975 76.59 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1976 73.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -3.4%
1977 72.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.8%
1978 73.63 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.3%
1979 72.7 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.3%
1980 72.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
1981 71.64 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.8%
1982 71.15 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.7%
1983 70.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.1%
1984 70.82 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.6%
1985 71.74 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.3%
1986 71.63 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
1987 71.72 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
1988 71.75 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.0%
1989 73.48 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +2.4%
1990 73.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.0%
1991 73.38 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
1992 73.1 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
1993 72.9 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.3%
1994 73.47 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.8%
1995 73.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.0%
1996 73.44 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.1%
1997 73.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.0%
1998 73.77 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.5%
1999 73.65 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.2%
2000 74.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.1%
2001 74.05 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
2002 73.71 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
2003 73.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.4%
2004 72.96 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.6%
2005 73.46 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.7%
2006 72.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -1.1%
2007 73 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.5%
2008 73.01 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.0%
2009 73.02 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.0%
2010 73.24 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
2011 73.4 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.2%
2012 73.5 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2013 73.6 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2014 74.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.1%
2015 73.99 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.5%
2016 74.21 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.3%
2017 74.78 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.8%
2018 74.85 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2019 73.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -2.2%
2020 73.83 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.9%
2021 73.2 Percentage of population in the same subgroup -0.9%
2022 74.26 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +1.5%
2023 74.31 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.1%
2024 74.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.8%
2025 74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 75.16 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 72.66 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 77.79 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 8
1980s 71.72 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 70.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 73.48 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
1990s 73.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 72.9 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 73.77 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2000s 73.37 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 72.67 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 74.42 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2010s 73.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 73.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 74.85 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 10
2020s 74.24 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 73.2 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 6

Countries ranked near Norway

  1. 27 Iceland 76.94 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  2. 28 Mexico 76.71 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  3. 29 Peru 75.29 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  4. 31 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 74.92 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  5. 32 Argentina 74.54 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare
  6. 33 Japan 73.81 Percentage of population in the same subgroup compare

See the full ranking of 53 places →

More work & labour data for Norway

All data for Norway →

Frequently asked questions

What is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway?
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway was 74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 2025, according to Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
What is the highest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Norway?
The highest recorded value was 77.79 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1972.
What is the lowest incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national recorded in Norway?
The lowest recorded value was 70.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in 1983.
How does Norway rank for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
Norway ranks 30th out of 40 countries with data for 2025.
Is incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national rising or falling in Norway?
Over the last ten years it is up 1.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Norway data come from?
The figures come from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as part of Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/norway/">Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national in Norway</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.