Norway vs Peru: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national

Norway
74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2025
Peru
75.29 Percentage of population in the same subgroup
in 2024
Norway rank
30th
Peru rank
29th

Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national over time

  • Norway
  • Peru
020406080197219982025

How they compare

Peru currently reports 75.29 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Norway, a difference of 0.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Peru ahead.

Norway ranks 30th and Peru ranks 29th of 40 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Peru Difference Ahead
2000s 73.02 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 76.41 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 3.39 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Peru
2010s 73.91 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 74.17 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 0.2538 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Peru
2020s 74.1 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 73.8 Percentage of population in the same subgroup 0.3036 Percentage of population in the same subgroup Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national, Norway or Peru?
Peru, at 75.29 Percentage of population in the same subgroup against 74.95 Percentage of population in the same subgroup in Norway as of 2024.
What is the difference in incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national between Norway and Peru?
0.34 Percentage of population in the same subgroup, with Peru ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Peru?
16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
How do Norway and Peru rank globally for incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national?
Norway ranks 30th and Peru ranks 29th of 40 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, published as Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Peru: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national. Statizoid, drawing on Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/norway/peru/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/compare/incidence-of-full-time-and-part-time-employment-based-on-national-definitions/norway/peru/">Norway vs Peru: Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Incidence of full-time and part-time employment based on national definitions
Unit
Percentage of population in the same subgroup
Source
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
Licence
OECD Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
53 places, 1,842 data points, 1966–2025
Last refreshed

This dataset contains incidences and gender composition of part-time employment with standardised (15-24, 25-54, 55-64, 65+, total) and detailed age groups. Data are further broken down by professional status - employees, total employment. Part-time employment is based on national definitions. The definition of part-time work varies considerably across OECD countries Essentially three main approaches can be distinguished: i) a classification based on the worker's perception of his/her employment situation; ii) a cut-off (generally 30 or 35 hours per week) based on usual working hours, with persons usually working fewer hours being considered part-timers; iii) a comparable cut-off based on actual hours worked during the reference week. A criterion based on actual hours will generally yield a part-time rate higher than one based on usual hours, particularly if there are temporary reductions in working time as a result of holidays, illness, short-timing, etc. On the other hand, it is not entirely clear whether a classification based on the worker's perception will necessarily yield estimates of part-time work that are higher or lower than one based on a fixed cut-off. In one country (France) which changed from 1981 to 1982 from a definition based on an actual hours cut-off (30 hours) to one based on the respondent's perception, the latter criterion appeared to produce slightly higher estimates. In order to facilitate analysis and comparisons over time, historical data for OECD members have been provided over as long a period as possible, often even before a country became a member of the Organisation. Information on the membership dates of all OECD countries can be found at OECD Ratification Dates. For detailed information on labour force surveys for all countries please see LFS_NOTES_SOURCES.