Fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate in American Samoa
American Samoa: Fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate was 42.4% in 1990. ▲ Rising
Fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate in American Samoa, 1960–1990
Source: Labour Force Statistics, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in %.
Analysis
In 1990, fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate in American Samoa stood at 42.4%.
That represents a change of up 24.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate in American Samoa peaked at 42.5% in 1960 and was at its lowest, 14.6%, in 1970.
American Samoa ranks 158th of 194 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate in American Samoa, year by year
| Year | % | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1960 | 42.5% | — |
| 1970 | 14.6% | -65.7% |
| 1974 | 38.4% | +163.7% |
| 1980 | 34.0% | -11.5% |
| 1990 | 42.4% | +24.6% |
American Samoa compared with similar countries
- American Samoa's 42.4% is below the median for high income countries, which is 57.2%, 74% of the median. (79 countries reporting)
- American Samoa's 42.4% is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 54.1%, 78% of the median. (33 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42.5% | 42.5% | 42.5% | 1 |
| 1970s | 26.5% | 14.6% | 38.4% | 2 |
| 1980s | 34.0% | 34.0% | 34.0% | 1 |
| 1990s | 42.4% | 42.4% | 42.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near American Samoa
More work & labour data for American Samoa
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.3915 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.1454 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 51.52 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5.24 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16.27 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16.03 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 32.29 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.4894 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.4409 % change on previous year (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate in American Samoa?
- Fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate in American Samoa was 42.4% in 1990, according to Labour Force Statistics, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate recorded in American Samoa?
- The highest recorded value was 42.5% in 1960.
- What is the lowest fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate recorded in American Samoa?
- The lowest recorded value was 14.6% in 1970.
- How does American Samoa rank for fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate?
- American Samoa ranks 158th out of 194 countries with data for 1990.
- Is fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate rising or falling in American Samoa?
- Over the last ten years it is up 24.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this American Samoa data come from?
- The figures come from Labour Force Statistics, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Fertility rate versus female labor force participation rate. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Share of the female working-age population who are economically active (employed or unemployed). Figures refer to national estimates and may not be fully comparable across countries.