Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Rwanda
Rwanda: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Rwanda, 1991–2025
Source: Statizoid (derived). Measured in units per US$ of GDP.
Analysis
Rwanda recorded 0 units per US$ of GDP for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in 2025.
That represents a change of down 5.0% on the previous year and down 27.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Rwanda peaked at 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1994 and was at its lowest, 0 units per US$ of GDP, in 2022.
Rwanda ranks 20th of 185 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP in Rwanda, year by year
| Year | units per US$ of GDP | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1991 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | — |
| 1992 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.3% |
| 1993 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.3% |
| 1994 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +116.8% |
| 1995 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -52.9% |
| 1996 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +12.9% |
| 1997 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.0% |
| 1998 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.3% |
| 1999 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.3% |
| 2000 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.1% |
| 2001 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +7.9% |
| 2002 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +3.0% |
| 2003 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.5% |
| 2004 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.2% |
| 2005 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.7% |
| 2006 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.5% |
| 2007 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -16.2% |
| 2008 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -19.3% |
| 2009 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -6.2% |
| 2010 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -4.8% |
| 2011 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.7% |
| 2012 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -7.4% |
| 2013 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +0.5% |
| 2014 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -2.6% |
| 2015 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2016 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.0% |
| 2017 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -3.7% |
| 2018 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -1.1% |
| 2019 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -8.9% |
| 2020 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +10.2% |
| 2021 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -14.8% |
| 2022 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -12.1% |
| 2023 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +4.4% |
| 2024 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | +1.6% |
| 2025 | 0 units per US$ of GDP | -5.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 9 |
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 10 |
| 2020s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 6 |
Countries ranked near Rwanda
- 17 Guinea-Bissau 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 18 South Sudan 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 19 Timor-Leste 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 21 Chad 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 22 Mali 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
- 23 Gambia 0 units per US$ of GDP compare
More work & labour data for Rwanda
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.267 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.2752 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.2591 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate 0.3518 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 3.32 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 6,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 15,403 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 16,639 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 16,140 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 32,779 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Rwanda?
- Employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp in Rwanda was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2025, according to Statizoid (derived).
- What is the highest employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp recorded in Rwanda?
- The highest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 1994.
- What is the lowest employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp recorded in Rwanda?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 units per US$ of GDP in 2022.
- How does Rwanda rank for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 20th out of 185 countries with data for 2025.
- Is employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp rising or falling in Rwanda?
- Over the last ten years it is down 27.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Rwanda data come from?
- The figures come from Statizoid (derived), published as part of Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 35 observations, free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page.
How this figure is calculated
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) ÷ GDP (current US$)
Computed from
- Employment International Labour Organization
- GDP Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Statizoid computes this series; the underlying measurements belong to the publishers named above. The arithmetic is applied to every country and year where both inputs report, and nothing is estimated unless the page says so.
About this data
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.