Rwanda vs South Sudan: Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP
Rwanda
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2025
South Sudan
0 units per US$ of GDP
in 2015
Rwanda rank
20th
South Sudan rank
18th
Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 units per US$ of GDP.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | 0 units per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp, Rwanda or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0 units per US$ of GDP against 0 units per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2015.
- What is the difference in employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp between Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 0 units per US$ of GDP, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2015.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan rank globally for employment (ilo modelled estimates), per unit of gdp?
- Rwanda ranks 20th and South Sudan ranks 18th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Employment (ILO modelled estimates), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Employment (ILO modelled estimates) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.