Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile was 15.3% in 2020. ▬ Flat
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB). Measured in % of population.
Analysis
In 2020, coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kyrgyzstan stood at 15.3%.
The figure is down 9.2% on the previous year and down 2.2% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 17.0% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 11.4%, in 2012.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th of 39 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | % of population | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 15.7% | — |
| 2011 | 15.6% | -0.5% |
| 2012 | 11.4% | -27.1% |
| 2013 | 13.3% | +16.5% |
| 2014 | 17.0% | +28.2% |
| 2015 | 12.5% | -26.4% |
| 2016 | 12.8% | +1.8% |
| 2017 | 13.9% | +8.5% |
| 2018 | 15.0% | +8.1% |
| 2019 | 16.8% | +12.5% |
| 2020 | 15.3% | -9.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.7% | 15.7% | 15.7% | 1 |
| 2010s | 14.3% | 11.4% | 17.0% | 9 |
| 2020s | 15.3% | 15.3% | 15.3% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kyrgyzstan?
- Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile in Kyrgyzstan was 15.3% in 2020, according to ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB).
- What is the highest coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 17.0% in 2014.
- What is the lowest coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 11.4% in 2012.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th out of 39 countries with data for 2020.
- Is coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as part of Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.