Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile
Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kosovo currently reports 19.5% against 15.3% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes Kosovo's figure about 1.3 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Kosovo has been ahead every year.
Kosovo ranks 34th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th of 39 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 16.2% | 15.7% | 0.4% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 29.0% | 13.6% | 15.4% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kosovo, at 19.5% against 15.3% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2017.
- What is the difference in coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 4.2%, with Kosovo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile?
- Kosovo ranks 34th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 36th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE: The Atlas of Social Protection - Indicators of Resilience and Equity, World Bank (WB), published as Coverage of social safety net programs in poorest quintile (% of population). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Coverage of social safety net programs shows the percentage of population participating in cash transfers and last resort programs, noncontributory social pensions, other cash transfers programs (child, family and orphan allowances, birth and death grants, disability benefits, and other allowances), conditional cash transfers, in-kind food transfers (food stamps and vouchers, food rations, supplementary feeding, and emergency food distribution), school feeding, other social assistance programs (housing allowances, scholarships, fee waivers, health subsidies, and other social assistance) and public works programs (cash for work and food for work). Estimates include both direct and indirect beneficiaries.