Coverage in 5th quintile: International … International Private in Vietnam

Vietnam: Coverage in 5th quintile: International … International Private was 5.8% in 2020. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2020)
5.8%
Change on year
up 620.4%
World rank
12th
of 28 countries
All-time high
15.5%
in 2006
All-time low
0.8%
in 2018
Years of data
6
2006–2020

Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private in Vietnam, 2006–2020

0510152006201320202006: 15.52010: 8.32012: 8.72014: 6.42018: 0.8082020: 5.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private in Vietnam stood at 5.8%.

The figure is up 620.4% on the previous year and down 29.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private in Vietnam peaked at 15.5% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0.8%, in 2018.

Vietnam ranks 12th of 28 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Coverage in 5th quintile: International … International Private in Vietnam, year by year

Annual values for Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers in Vietnam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 15.5% —
2010 8.3% -46.7%
2012 8.7% +4.6%
2014 6.4% -26.2%
2018 0.8% -87.4%
2020 5.8% +620.4%

Vietnam compared with similar countries

  • Vietnam's 5.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 4.8%, 1.2× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 15.5% 15.5% 15.5% 1
2010s 6.0% 0.8% 8.7% 4
2020s 5.8% 5.8% 5.8% 1

Countries ranked near Vietnam

  1. 9 Albania 12.6% compare
  2. 10 Pakistan 12.4% compare
  3. 11 Sri Lanka 10.2% compare
  4. 13 Bolivia 5.5% compare
  5. 14 Kyrgyzstan 5.3% compare
  6. 15 Paraguay 4.9% compare

See the full ranking of 28 places →

More work & labour data for Vietnam

All data for Vietnam →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private in Vietnam?
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private in Vietnam was 5.8% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private recorded in Vietnam?
The highest recorded value was 15.5% in 2006.
What is the lowest coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private recorded in Vietnam?
The lowest recorded value was 0.8% in 2018.
How does Vietnam rank for coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private?
Vietnam ranks 12th out of 28 countries with data for 2020.
Is coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international private rising or falling in Vietnam?
Over the last ten years it is down 29.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Vietnam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private in Vietnam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/viet-nam/">Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private in Vietnam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
28 places, 272 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in International Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)