Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Dominican Republic
Dominican Republic: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 43.4% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Dominican Republic, 2007–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Dominican Republic is 43.4%, measured in 2021.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 3.2% on the previous year and down 1.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Dominican Republic peaked at 69.1% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 28.5%, in 2015.
That places Dominican Republic 6th out of 30 countries with data for 2021, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 14 years of available data.
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Dominican Republic, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 | 34.1% | — |
| 2008 | 39.0% | +14.4% |
| 2009 | 35.5% | -9.0% |
| 2010 | 46.5% | +30.9% |
| 2011 | 44.1% | -5.1% |
| 2012 | 43.7% | -0.9% |
| 2013 | 49.0% | +12.2% |
| 2014 | 69.1% | +40.9% |
| 2015 | 28.5% | -58.8% |
| 2016 | 40.9% | +43.7% |
| 2017 | 42.7% | +4.3% |
| 2018 | 44.9% | +5.3% |
| 2019 | 44.9% | -0.1% |
| 2021 | 43.4% | -3.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 36.2% | 34.1% | 39.0% | 3 |
| 2010s | 45.4% | 28.5% | 69.1% | 10 |
| 2020s | 43.4% | 43.4% | 43.4% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Dominican Republic
More work & labour data for Dominican Republic
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5342 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5118 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5561 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.48 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.3757 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 12,209 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,056 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,888 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,787 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,675 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Dominican Republic?
- Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Dominican Republic was 43.4% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The highest recorded value was 69.1% in 2014.
- What is the lowest coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Dominican Republic?
- The lowest recorded value was 28.5% in 2015.
- How does Dominican Republic rank for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Dominican Republic ranks 6th out of 30 countries with data for 2021.
- Is coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Dominican Republic?
- Over the last ten years it is down 1.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Dominican Republic data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 14 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)