Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus

Belarus: Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 50.5% in 2019. ▼ Falling

Latest (2019)
50.5%
Change on year
up 9.7%
World rank
4th
of 30 countries
All-time high
64.2%
in 2009
All-time low
44.2%
in 2012
Years of data
11
2008–2019

Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus, 2008–2019

02040602008201320192008: 55.32009: 64.22010: 582012: 44.22013: 54.42014: 50.42015: 54.62016: 62.22017: 55.82018: 462019: 50.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2019, coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus stood at 50.5%.

The figure is up 9.7% on the previous year and down 21.4% over ten years.

Over the whole period, coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus peaked at 64.2% in 2009 and was at its lowest, 44.2%, in 2012.

Belarus ranks 4th of 30 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 11 years of available data.

Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus, year by year

Annual values for Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Belarus, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 55.3%
2009 64.2% +16.1%
2010 58.0% -9.7%
2012 44.2% -23.8%
2013 54.4% +23.0%
2014 50.4% -7.3%
2015 54.6% +8.3%
2016 62.2% +13.9%
2017 55.8% -10.3%
2018 46.0% -17.5%
2019 50.5% +9.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 59.8% 55.3% 64.2% 2
2010s 52.9% 44.2% 62.2% 9

Countries ranked near Belarus

  1. 1 Ecuador 81.6% compare
  2. 2 Georgia 63.1% compare
  3. 3 Malawi 52.1% compare
  4. 5 Thailand 43.7% compare
  5. 6 Dominican Republic 43.4% compare
  6. 7 Bolivia 26.3% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Belarus

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus?
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers in Belarus was 50.5% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The highest recorded value was 64.2% in 2009.
What is the lowest coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Belarus?
The lowest recorded value was 44.2% in 2012.
How does Belarus rank for coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers?
Belarus ranks 4th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
Is coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Belarus?
Over the last ten years it is down 21.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Belarus data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/belarus/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/coverage-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/belarus/">Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Belarus</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of population participating in Domestic Private Transfers programs (includes direct and indirect beneficiaries)