Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Türkiye

Türkiye: Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 19.5% in 2013. ▲ Rising

Latest (2013)
19.5%
Change on year
up 14.3%
World rank
23rd
of 30 countries
All-time high
24.3%
in 2005
All-time low
12.1%
in 2008
Years of data
10
2004–2013

Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Türkiye, 2004–2013

05101520252004200820132004: 12.22005: 24.32006: 21.12007: 20.62008: 12.12009: 20.62010: 19.92011: 22.32012: 17.12013: 19.5

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Türkiye is 19.5%, measured in 2013.

That represents a change of up 14.3% on the previous year and up 60.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Türkiye peaked at 24.3% in 2005 and was at its lowest, 12.1%, in 2008.

That places Türkiye 23rd out of 30 countries with data for 2013, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Türkiye, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Türkiye, 2004 to 2013.
Year Value Change
2004 12.2%
2005 24.3% +99.2%
2006 21.1% -12.9%
2007 20.6% -2.5%
2008 12.1% -41.5%
2009 20.6% +70.7%
2010 19.9% -3.3%
2011 22.3% +11.8%
2012 17.1% -23.2%
2013 19.5% +14.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 18.5% 12.1% 24.3% 6
2010s 19.7% 17.1% 22.3% 4

Countries ranked near Türkiye

  1. 20 Burkina Faso 20.1% compare
  2. 21 Poland 20.0% compare
  3. 22 Uruguay 19.7% compare
  4. 24 Brazil 18.7%
  5. 25 Georgia 18.3%
  6. 26 Kyrgyzstan 17.4% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Türkiye

All data for Türkiye →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Türkiye?
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Türkiye was 19.5% in 2013, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Türkiye?
The highest recorded value was 24.3% in 2005.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Türkiye?
The lowest recorded value was 12.1% in 2008.
How does Türkiye rank for benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
Türkiye ranks 23rd out of 30 countries with data for 2013.
Is benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Türkiye?
Over the last ten years it is up 60.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Türkiye data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Türkiye. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/turkiye/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-4th-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/turkiye/">Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Türkiye</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 4th quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the fourth quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population