Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private was 13.6% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in preT.
Analysis
Kyrgyzstan recorded 13.6% for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in 2020.
That represents a change of down 11.2% on the previous year and up 12.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 18.3% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 4.7%, in 2006.
That places Kyrgyzstan 6th out of 27 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | preT | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 4.7% | — |
| 2011 | 12.1% | +155.7% |
| 2012 | 11.4% | -5.2% |
| 2013 | 18.3% | +60.7% |
| 2014 | 11.3% | -38.4% |
| 2015 | 17.0% | +50.3% |
| 2016 | 11.8% | -30.5% |
| 2017 | 13.5% | +14.1% |
| 2018 | 15.1% | +12.1% |
| 2019 | 15.3% | +1.1% |
| 2020 | 13.6% | -11.2% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 13.6% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 12.2%, 1.1× the median. (8 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.7% | 4.7% | 4.7% | 1 |
| 2010s | 14.0% | 11.3% | 18.3% | 9 |
| 2020s | 13.6% | 13.6% | 13.6% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
- 3 Armenia 14.9% compare
- 4 Mexico 14.9% compare
- 5 Viet Nam 13.7% compare
- 7 Republic of Moldova 13.4% compare
- 8 El Salvador 12.3% compare
- 9 Burkina Faso 12.2% compare
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kyrgyzstan?
- Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private in Kyrgyzstan was 13.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 18.3% in 2013.
- What is the lowest benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 4.7% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
- Is benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population