Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private
Armenia
14.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
13.6%
in 2020
Armenia rank
3rd
Kyrgyzstan rank
6th
Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 14.9% against 13.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 19.2% | 14.0% | 5.3% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 16.7% | 13.6% | 3.2% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Armenia, at 14.9% against 13.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.3%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - international private?
- Armenia ranks 3rd and Kyrgyzstan ranks 6th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefits incidence in 2nd quintile (%) - International Private Transfers (preT). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of benefits going to the second quintile relative to the total benefits going to the population