Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam

Viet Nam: Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private was 3.3% in 2020. ▼ Falling

Latest (2020)
3.3%
World rank
31st
of 31 countries
All-time high
8.4%
in 2006
All-time low
3.3%
in 2020
Years of data
5
2006–2020

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam, 2006–2020

024682006201320202006: 8.42010: 3.42012: 4.42014: 5.82020: 3.3

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam stood at 3.3%. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

That represents a change of down 2.6% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam peaked at 8.4% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 3.3%, in 2020.

Viet Nam ranks 31st of 31 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam, year by year

Annual values for Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban in Viet Nam, 2006 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2006 8.4%
2010 3.4% -60.1%
2012 4.4% +30.9%
2014 5.8% +32.0%
2020 3.3% -43.6%

Viet Nam compared with similar countries

  • Viet Nam's 3.3% is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 12.8%, 26% of the median. (19 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 8.4% 8.4% 8.4% 1
2010s 4.5% 3.4% 5.8% 3
2020s 3.3% 3.3% 3.3% 1

Countries ranked near Viet Nam

  1. 28 Türkiye 6.4% compare
  2. 29 Sri Lanka 4.8% compare
  3. 30 Malawi 3.8% compare

See the full ranking of 31 places →

More work & labour data for Viet Nam

All data for Viet Nam →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam?
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private in Viet Nam was 3.3% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Viet Nam?
The highest recorded value was 8.4% in 2006.
What is the lowest benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private recorded in Viet Nam?
The lowest recorded value was 3.3% in 2020.
How does Viet Nam rank for benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private?
Viet Nam ranks 31st out of 31 countries with data for 2020.
Is benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - domestic private rising or falling in Viet Nam?
Over the last ten years it is down 2.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Viet Nam data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefits-incidence-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-domestic-private-transfers-urban/viet-nam/">Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private in Viet Nam</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefits incidence in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -urban
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 316 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Percentage of benefits going to the 1st quintile (poorest) relative to the total benefits going to the population