Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural by country

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)

Countries reporting
30
Highest
0.4377
Republic of Moldova
Lowest
0.008
Poland
Median
0.2114
Years covered
21
2003–2023
Data points
295

What the numbers show

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural is currently reported for 30 countries. The highest value is 0.4377 in Republic of Moldova; the lowest is 0.008 in Poland.

The median across all reporting countries is 0.2114, and the mean is 0.2191.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 55.

Over the past decade 20 countries rose and 10 fell. The largest increase was in Republic of Moldova (up 147.0%), and the largest decrease in Poland (down 95.8%).

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Republic of Moldova 0.4377 2018 up 147.0% rising
2 Thailand 0.3684 2021 up 10.9% rising
3 Romania 0.3498 2021 up 36.7% rising
4 Pakistan 0.3288 2018 down 4.5% flat
5 Costa Rica 0.3034 2022 up 59.1% flat
6 Dominican Republic 0.2995 2021 up 12.9% rising
7 Chile 0.2944 2022 down 0.8% flat
8 Paraguay 0.2739 2022 up 70.5% rising
9 Uruguay 0.2552 2022 down 4.6% rising
10 Armenia 0.2467 2022 down 15.3% falling
11 Sri Lanka 0.2431 2019 up 13.7% falling
12 Türkiye 0.2411 2013 down 21.6% falling
13 Mongolia 0.222 2020 up 38.6% rising
14 Viet Nam 0.221 2020 up 49.1% rising
15 Mexico 0.2201 2022 down 27.0% falling
16 Belarus 0.2028 2019 down 0.8% falling
17 Colombia 0.1958 2022 up 20.8% rising
18 El Salvador 0.1953 2022 up 8.0% rising
19 Georgia 0.1911 2021 up 40.6% rising
20 Kazakhstan 0.1875 2021 up 13.1% rising
21 Kyrgyzstan 0.1843 2020 up 18.9% rising
22 Brazil 0.1776 2022 down 49.0% falling
23 Ecuador 0.1708 2022 up 20.3% falling
24 Malawi 0.1669 2019 up 46.6% rising
25 Honduras 0.1392 2019 up 5.5% flat
26 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.1383 2021 up 67.5% rising
27 Peru 0.1302 2022 up 60.2% flat
28 Burkina Faso 0.0974 2021 down 51.5% falling
29 Panama 0.082 2023 up 10.0% falling
30 Poland 0.008 2019 down 95.8% falling

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile by country. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest-rural/">Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)