Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Peru
Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile was 0.1709 poorest in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Peru, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Peru is 0.1709 poorest, measured in 2022. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 10.8% on the previous year and up 158.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Peru peaked at 0.1709 poorest in 2022 and was at its lowest, 0.0611 poorest, in 2008.
Peru ranks 22nd of 37 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile in Peru, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.0611 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.0631 poorest | +3.3% |
| 2010 | 0.0666 poorest | +5.6% |
| 2011 | 0.063 poorest | -5.5% |
| 2012 | 0.0661 poorest | +5.0% |
| 2013 | 0.0697 poorest | +5.4% |
| 2014 | 0.0709 poorest | +1.6% |
| 2015 | 0.124 poorest | +75.1% |
| 2016 | 0.116 poorest | -6.5% |
| 2017 | 0.1185 poorest | +2.1% |
| 2018 | 0.1223 poorest | +3.2% |
| 2019 | 0.1205 poorest | -1.5% |
| 2020 | 0.1471 poorest | +22.1% |
| 2021 | 0.1543 poorest | +4.9% |
| 2022 | 0.1709 poorest | +10.8% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0621 poorest | 0.0611 poorest | 0.0631 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.0938 poorest | 0.063 poorest | 0.124 poorest | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.1574 poorest | 0.1471 poorest | 0.1709 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Peru
More work & labour data for Peru
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.4349 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.4225 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.4473 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.6786 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 35,667 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,953 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 19,027 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 19,136 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 38,163 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Peru?
- Benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile in Peru was 0.1709 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile recorded in Peru?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1709 poorest in 2022.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile recorded in Peru?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0611 poorest in 2008.
- How does Peru rank for benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile?
- Peru ranks 22nd out of 37 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - all social protection and labor -1st quintile rising or falling in Peru?
- Over the last ten years it is up 158.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Peru data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - All Social Protection and Labor -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in SPL programs (%)